The purpose of this document is to disclose the levels of protection associated with the different levels of segregation.in respect of securities held directly for clients with Central Securities Depositories (CSDs) within the European Union (EU), including a description of the main legal implications of the respective levels of segregation offered and information on the insolvency law applicable.
This disclosure is required under Art. 38(6) of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) in relation to CSDs domiciled in the EU. The information provided herein is subject to Swiss law.
This document is not intended to constitute legal or other advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should seek your own legal advice if you require any guidance on the matters stated herein.
Credit Suisse AG ("Bank") is incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability, with the following branches: (i) Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch, a branch registered in Singapore having registration numer S73FC2261L and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a wholesale bank; (ii) Credit Suisse AG, Hong Kong SAR, China branch registered as an Authorized Institution with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority; and (iii) Credit Suisse AG, Sydney Branch, a foreign Authorised Deposit-taking Institution under the Banking Act 1959 (Cth) and supervised by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, and holds an Australian financial services licence AFSL 226896.
Throughout this document, references to "Bank" are to the relevant head office or branch of Credit Suisse AG, acting as participant in the relevant CSD.
The Bank is a Participant of CSDs domiciled in the EU. According to Art. 38 para. 5 and 6 CSDR a Participant of such CSD shall offer its clients at least the choice between omnibus client segregation and individual client segregation and inform them of the costs and risks associated with each option including a description of the main legal implications of the respective levels of segregation offered and information on the insolvency law applicable. Under CSDR, CSDs of which the Bank is a Participant have their own disclosure obligations.
In the Bank's own books and records, the Bank records each client's individual entitlement to securities that it holds for that client in a separate client account. The Bank also opens accounts with a CSD in its own name (i.e. the account is held in the name of the Bank but designated as client account) in which it holds clients' securities. As a general rule, the Bank makes two types of accounts with CSDs available to clients: Individual Client Segregated Accounts (ISAs) and Omnibus Client Segregated Accounts (OSAs).
An ISA is used to hold the securities of a single client and therefore the client's securities are held separately from the securities of other clients and the Bank's own proprietary securities.
An OSA is used to hold the securities of a number of clients on a collective basis. However, the Bank does not hold its own proprietary securities in OSAs.
3. Main legal implications of levels of segregation
If a Swiss bank were to become insolvent, the insolvency proceedings would take place in Switzerland and be governed by Swiss insolvency law. Nevertheless, foreign branches of a Swiss bank may also be subject to insolvency proceedings in the foreign location in question governed by local insolvency law.
In addition, there may be proceedings running in foreign courts in aid of the insolvency proceedings initiated in the home jurisdiction. In contrast with Singapore and Australia, Hong Kong SAR, China has not yet adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Nevertheless, Hong Kong SAR, China Courts may recognize foreign insolvency proceedings provided the foreign insolvency proceedings are “collective insolvency proceedings” and commenced in the company's country of incorporation.
Clients' legal entitlement to the securities that the Bank holds for them directly with a CSD would generally (except in specific circumstances, some of which are discussed below) not be affected by the Bank's insolvency (bankruptcy), regardless of whether those securities were held in ISAs or OSAs.
In practice, the exclusion of securities from the Bank's bankruptcy estate would further depend on a number of additional factors, the most relevant of which are discussed below.
Exclusion from the bank's bankruptcy estate
Under Swiss insolvency laws, intermediated securities and certain other safe custody assets within the meaning of the Banking Act booked on safekeeping accounts held by clients with a Swiss bank, as well as certain readily available claims of the bank to receive delivery of securities from third parties, do not form part of the bankruptcy estate. Instead, in an insolvency (bankruptcy) of a bank, they are designated to be excluded in favour of the relevant client, subject to any claims the bank has against the client.
According to Art. 11 FISA, a Swiss bank must hold with itself or with a sub-custodian or a CSD intermediated securities (available securities) in a quantity and of a kind at least equal to, the total of intermediated securities credited to the securities accounts maintained by the bank for its clients.
A bank is also subject to strict requirements as to maintenance of accurate books and records and as to reconciliation of its records against those of the CSDs and sub-custodians with which the intermediated securities are held. Accordingly, as long as a bank maintains sufficient holdings of intermediated securities in accordance with its statutory obligations, clients should receive the same level of protection in the bank's insolvency, regardless of whether the intermediated securities are held in an ISA or an OSA. However, ISA could contribute to swifter identification of client assets in a default scenario.
Under Singapore laws, the Bank is subject to regulatory requirements to segregate its proprietary non-cash assets from the non-cash assets of clients that the Bank receives and holds in the course of its business of regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Act, Cap 289, and hold such non-cash assets in custody accounts (with itself or third party custodians) on trust for clients. In the event of the Bank's insolvency, securities belonging to clients held in such custody accounts with the Bank are segregated and do not form part of the Bank's estate and cannot be used to satisfy the Bank's creditors, provided that they remain securities of the clients and subject to any claim that the Bank has against the clients. This applies equally whether the securities held in custody are in an ISA or an OSA, although ISAs could potentially contribute to swifter identification of client securities in an insolvency proceeding.
Under Hong Kong SAR, China laws, provided that the securities belonging to the client held in a custody account (whether an ISA or an OSA) are segregated and clearly identifiable on the books and records of the Bank as belonging to such client, and there is evidence of an intention coupled with the conduct of the parties that the securities are held on trust by the Bank, such client has the proprietary interest in those securities and those securities will not constitute assets belonging to the Bank available for distribution to its creditors in the insolvency of the Bank.
Further, under Hong Kong SAR, China laws, where the Bank receives or holds certain client securities in the course of its business of regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong), the Bank is required to ensure that such client securities are either: (i) deposited in safe custody in a segregated account (which is designated as a trust account or client account) in Hong Kong (SAR), China with certain designated custodians; (ii) (in the case of securities collateral only) deposited in an account in the name of the Bank or its associated entity whose business is to receive or hold in Hong Kong (SAR), China client assets of the Bank with certain designated custodians; or (iii) registered in the name of the client, (in the case of securities collateral only) the Bank, or the Bank's associated entity whose business is to receive or hold in Hong Kong (SAR), China client assets of the Bank. It is likley that such client securities will not constitute assets belonging to the Bank available for distribution to its creditors in the insolvency of the Bank.
Under Australian law, the Bank when acting as a custodian must hold client assets on trust and segregated from its proprietary assets except where the client's money is held in a deposit product. In the event of the Bank's insolvency, assets belonging to clients held in such custody or trust accounts with the Bank are segregated and do not form part of the Bank's estate and cannot be used to satisfy the Bank's creditors, provided that they remain securities of the clients and subject to any claim that the Bank has against the clients. This applies equally whether the securities held in custody are in an ISA or an OSA, although ISAs could potentially contribute to swifter identification of client securities in an insolvency proceeding.
Nature of clients' interests
Although client's securities are held in the Bank's name at CSDs, Bank holds them on behalf of Bank's clients.
For securities that are held in a CSD, the nature of the entitlement embodied in a security also depends on the law, regulations and contractual framework applicable to such other CSDs and further parties involved in the custody chain. In such a case, entitlements that are available for exclusion may be limited to contractual claims against a CSD involved. Moreover, the ability of the client to exclude securities in the case of insolvency may depend on whether a CSD or any custodian in the custody chain could assert any right to set-off, retention right, security interest or similar right with respect to the securities (see also "Security interests" below).
As described above, the statutory requirements are designed to ensure that a bank holds intermediated securities in a quantity and a kind at least equal to the intermediated securities credited to client accounts. If notwithstanding these requirements there were a shortfall between the number of intermediated securities that a bank is obliged to deliver to clients and the number of intermediated securities that the bank holds on their behalf in either an ISA or an OSA, this could result in fewer intermediated securities than clients are entitled to being returned to them on the bank's insolvency. The way in which a shortfall could arise and would be treated may be different as between ISAs and OSAs.
How a shortfall may arise
A shortfall could arise for a number of reasons including as a result of administrative error, intraday movements or counterparty default. In most cases a shortfall occurs as a result of a mismatch between the time when a bank receives intermediated securities and the earlier time when the delivery is booked to the account of the receiving account holder. In Switzerland, typically for exchange traded transaction, banks credit the client accounts immediately on trade date while the effective delivery may not occur intraday but later (most markets have settlement cycles of 2 or 3 days). As a result, a recipient client could dispose of its intermediated securities as soon as they are credited to its securities account, irrespective of whether the bank has actually already received the intermediated securities. This process is referred to as contractual settlement. Contractual settlement may therefore cause a difference between the bank's number of intermediated securities at the CSD and the clients' higher number of aggregated securities credited to their securities accounts. In the normal course of the settlement this process-immanent difference disappears at the end of the settlement cycle. Contractual settlement increases market liquidity, accelerates deliveries and settlement, and is based on the fact that a failed settlement of an exchange traded transaction (and the risk that, as a result, a bank does not hold sufficient available securities) is rare. The risk involved with shortfalls is further mitigated by the fact that, if a shortfall arises, a bank is obliged to acquire without delay securities if and to the extent the total number of available securities is less than the total number of securities credited to clients' accounts (see below). In addition, pursuant to the Bank's standard account opening terms and conditions, the Bank may at its sole and absolute discretion, reverse the provisional credit and/or debit on the client account to reflect that settlement in fact did not take place on the specified date.
In the case of an ISA, the securities held in the ISA can only be delivered out for the settlement of transactions made by the ISA client. As a matter of principle, this may reduce the risk of a shortfall in that account, but also increases the risk of settlement failure which, in turn, may incur additional costs (e.g. buy-in costs) and/or delay in settlements.
Treatment of a shortfall
In the case of an ISA, although arguments could be made that the relevant client should not be exposed to a shortfall that is clearly attributable to an account held for another client or clients, it cannot be excluded that a shortfall on any other (ISA or OSA) account would be shared rateably among clients, including clients who do not have an interest in the relevant account. Accordingly, a client holding whose securities are held in an ISA may still be exposed to a shortfall on an account held for another client or clients.
In the case of an OSA, a shortfall attributable to the OSA would be shared rateably among the clients with an interest in the OSA (and potentially other clients). Therefore, a client may be exposed to a shortfall even where securities have been lost in circumstances which are completely unrelated to that client.
If a shortfall arises for the Bank is liable, and the Bank does not cover the shortfall, clients may have a claim for compensation against the Bank.
If the Bank were to become insolvent prior to covering a shortfall, clients would rank as general unsecured creditors for any amounts owing to them in connection with such a claim. Clients would therefore be exposed to the risks of the Bank's insolvency, including the risk that they may not be able to recover all or part of any compensation claimed.
In order to calculate clients' shares of any shortfall in respect of an OSA, each client's entitlement to securities held within that account would need to be established as a matter of law and fact based on the Bank's books and records. The shortfall would then be allocated among the clients as described above. It may therefore be a time-consuming process to confirm each client's entitlement and establish the securities available for exclusion. This could give rise to delays in returning securities and initial uncertainty for a client as to its actual entitlement on an insolvency.
4. Security interests
Security interest granted to a CSD
Where a CSD benefits from a security interest (either it benefits from a statutory right or a contractual right based on its terms and conditions) over securities held by the bank with it (including securities held for clients), there could be a delay in the return of securities to a client (and a possible shortfall) in the event that the bank failed to satisfy its obligations to a CSD and the security interest was enforced. This applies regardless of whether the securities are held in an ISA or an OSA. However, in practice, we would expect that a CSD would first seek recourse to any securities held in the Bank's proprietary accounts to satisfy the Bank's obligations and only then make use of securities in client accounts. We would also expect a CSD to enforce its security rateably across client accounts held with it. Furthermore, Swiss law requires the liquidator to satisfy claims of the CSD arising out of the custody of intermediated securities or the financing of their acquisition.
Security interest granted to third party
Where a client purported to grant a security interest over its interest in securities held in an OSA and the security interest was asserted against the CSD with which the account was held, there could be a delay in the return of securities to all clients holding securities in the relevant account (and a possible shortfall in the account). However, in practice, Bank would expect that the beneficiary of a security interest (pledgee) over a client's securities would perfect its security by notifying Bank rather than a CSD and would seek to enforce the security against Bank rather than against the CSD, with which it had no relationship.
Set out below are links to the disclosures made by CSDs in the EU in which Bank is a Participant:
|Euroclear Bank SA/NV
||International CSD (located in Belgium)