What is the retirement age of the future?
Articles & stories

What is the retirement age of the future?

Increased longevity, declining birth rates and lower financial returns for pension funds are all putting pressure on pension systems. Is a work free retirement period in your 60s and beyond a thing of the past? The recent Credit Suisse report Rethinking Retirement delves deeper.

By accessing the videos and/or podcasts in this page, you hereby consent to Credit Suisse disclosing your full IP address to YouTube and/or SoundCloud for the purpose of enabling you to view or listen to the content hosted in those platforms. These third party platforms are not operated or monitored by Credit Suisse, and your IP address and any other personal data collected, processed or stored by these third party platforms will be subject to their own privacy policies, and Credit Suisse will not be responsible for their treatment of personal data.

A changing world

Both developed and developing countries will face the problems associated with an aging population. The world is undergoing a major demographic transition. Not only are there more elderly people but they are living longer. Average life expectancy has increased globally by 25 years since 1950 from 47 to 72 years today. Advances in the treatment of infectious diseases, improved nutrition and better awareness of the benefits of a healthy lifestyle have all sparked the longevity revolution.

Traditional retirement

In developed countries a person’s life could be typically be divided into 3 stages: education, working career, followed by retirement with a retirement age in your early 60s. People in developing countries more often experienced only two stages; education then work with no expected retirement period, either because of a less secure pension system or because they could not afford to retire.

As fertility rates decline pension systems struggle to provide for the growing proportion of people beyond retirement age and those people are living longer. The low interest rate environment exacerbates the problem where pension funds generate less return leaving them less capital to pay out.

Why retirement age is problematic

Age as a number does not indicate the same healthiness or wellbeing for all, meaning that your biological age may differ from your chronological age. This has also dramatically changed over time. A 65 year old living in 1950 in Switzerland would today have the biological age of 51. This is why a rigid retirement age also poses a problem. Whilst increasing the retirement age would not be problematic for healthy people those who are less healthy may be seriously challenged by additional years in the labor force, whilst not working could lead to a reduction in income in retirement.

Retirement in the future

We may need to start to rethink the three-stage lifecycle in countries with aging populations where this is common (Rethinking Retirement cites France, Germany and Switzerland) and consider longer working careers. This could change the way we conduct our working lives with more emphasis on mental and physical wellbeing so that we can continue to work for longer. Our longer working lives would incorporate more regular education periods so that we can be relevant to the workforce and keep job satisfaction for older workers. The workplace itself would also have to change to accommodate shorter working hours for older people as well as tackling age discrimination in recruitment. All this means that the retirement age of the future may be entirely individual if it exists at all.